|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
   |
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
DidntWantThatShipAnway wrote:Banned because he filed one petition.
Then a bunch of other people copied the body of his petition (he didn't ask them to) and filed their own.
How is this his fault?
:CCP:
Belthizaar wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why.
Not the brightest move. He sent it once. You're wrong. You can only send 3 petitions at any one time, if you dont believe me, try it yourself.
If he hadn't made the contents of his petition public and had a legion of retards not copied/pasted it, he would not have got banned.
Arguably, not his fault but hey, if you going to play with a bunch of spaz's and they act like spaz's and you get blamed for it, you don't really get to cry about it.
Next time, don't share petition contents with lemmings? |
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tarion Awessi wrote:
Besides, if other people using your petition is reason for you to get banned, then I see a new metagaming tactic coming.
How do they find out about it if the petition owner doesn't share it?
|
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gabriel Grimoire wrote:Pubbie carebears have no say in this issue. Please return to mining veldspar and leave this issue to the big boys.
oh, from what i'm seeing here, we ARE leaving it to you to get your own members banned.
well done. |
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tarion Awessi wrote:K Suri wrote:And they got the copy of the petition how? Can you point to anywhere in the rules where sharing your petition (Not the GM response, the petition itself) is against the rules? You can keep trying to reason around this, but CCP got spammed with dozens/hundreds/thousands of petitions and decided to ban the guy they viewed as being responsible. It might not be fair, but CCP don't care about fair, they (presumably) care about keeping their petition system free of 'spam'.
Not directly his fault, sure, but again - act like lemmings and don't be surprised when you get kicked over a cliff? |
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:
2. Banning a guy who sends in a petition.
3. Not banning guys who spam said petition.
Whilst #3 would have been an out and out travesty, the tears/trolls/threadnaughts protesting the banning of 80% (or whatever the figure is) of TEST would have been spectacular.
|
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:well Helicity...
oh yeah they even reversed that cause even THEY knew it was stupid
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but did Helicity get unbanned?
|
Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris
Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Pesky LaRue wrote:Richard Hammond II wrote:well Helicity...
oh yeah they even reversed that cause even THEY knew it was stupid
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but did Helicity get unbanned? well Ive seen her posting Id assume so
I had seen Liang post but not Helicity - I guess I would have found out come the next Hulkaggedon :) |
|
|
| |
|